Journal Review Timeline Guide | How Long Should Under Review Status Last for SCI/SSCI Journals
How long should Under Review status last? AcademicIdeas covers SCI/SSCI journal review timelines: average review periods by journal tier, status meanings, when to follow up, and proper follow-up email templates.
Direct answer for this topic
How long should Under Review status last? AcademicIdeas covers SCI/SSCI journal review timelines: average review periods by journal tier, status meanings, when to follow up, and proper follow-up email templates.
- Average review periods by SCI journal discipline and tier
- Meanings of each manuscript status change
- When and how to professionally follow up with editors
- From submission to publication: submission (1-3 days) → editor initial review (1-4 weeks) → peer review (2-6 months) → decision → revision (1-3 months) → re-review (1-3 months) → acceptance (1-2 months) → proofreading (2-4 weeks) → online publication.
Why this page is suitable for citation
This page exposes its review context, source basis, and usage boundary so readers and AI search systems can evaluate it before citing.
Reviewed against the platform’s public reviewer-response, cover-letter, journal-paper, and SCI-polishing pages, together with Wiley’s official peer-review workflow guidance and the ICMJE recommendations baseline, so this page stays focused on status changes, follow-up timing, and revision-cycle expectations.
Related workflows and reference pages
What this page helps you do first
- Average review periods by SCI journal discipline and tier
- Meanings of each manuscript status change
- When and how to professionally follow up with editors
Standard journal peer review workflow and timeline
From submission to publication: submission (1-3 days) → editor initial review (1-4 weeks) → peer review (2-6 months) → decision → revision (1-3 months) → re-review (1-3 months) → acceptance (1-2 months) → proofreading (2-4 weeks) → online publication.
Review periods by journal type
- [Q1 Top journals (IF>10)] Average 3-6 months review
- [Q1 journals (IF 5-10)] Average 2-4 months review
- [Q2 journals (IF 3-5)] Average 1-3 months review
- [Q3 journals (IF 1-3)] Average 1-2 months review
- [Query tools] Elsevier Journal Finder, Springer Journal Suggester, Wiley Journal Finder
Common status meanings and normal duration
- [Submitted to Journal] 1-3 days to next status
- [With Editor] Usually 1-2 weeks to assign reviewers
- [Under Review] Longest phase: typically 2-6 months
- [Required Reviews Completed] Usually 1-2 weeks to editor decision
- [Major/Minor Revision] Good sign — typically 1-3 months to respond
When and how to follow up professionally
- [When to follow up] Usually after exceeding average review period by 1+ month
- [Email template] Dear [Editor Name], I am writing to inquire about the status of my manuscript (ID: [ID], Title: [Title]) submitted to [Journal] on [Date]. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, [Author]
Frequently asked questions
- Has my paper been rejected if Under Review exceeds 6 months?
- No. Under Review only means the paper is still being evaluated. Review duration varies based on journal tier, reviewer availability, and number of review rounds.
- What are the odds of rejection after Major Revision?
- Typically 20-30%. Major Revision means reviewers see value but need significant changes. Thorough responses and revisions greatly improve acceptance odds.