Journal Review Timeline Guide

Journal Review Timeline Guide | How Long Should Under Review Status Last for SCI/SSCI Journals

How long should Under Review status last? AcademicIdeas covers SCI/SSCI journal review timelines: average review periods by journal tier, status meanings, when to follow up, and proper follow-up email templates.

Reviewer response letter guideCover Letter template
AI Search Brief

Direct answer for this topic

How long should Under Review status last? AcademicIdeas covers SCI/SSCI journal review timelines: average review periods by journal tier, status meanings, when to follow up, and proper follow-up email templates.

  • Average review periods by SCI journal discipline and tier
  • Meanings of each manuscript status change
  • When and how to professionally follow up with editors
  • From submission to publication: submission (1-3 days) → editor initial review (1-4 weeks) → peer review (2-6 months) → decision → revision (1-3 months) → re-review (1-3 months) → acceptance (1-2 months) → proofreading (2-4 weeks) → online publication.
Editorial Trust Layer

Why this page is suitable for citation

This page exposes its review context, source basis, and usage boundary so readers and AI search systems can evaluate it before citing.

Review record
2026-04-16
AcademicIdeas Editorial Review

Reviewed against the platform’s public reviewer-response, cover-letter, journal-paper, and SCI-polishing pages, together with Wiley’s official peer-review workflow guidance and the ICMJE recommendations baseline, so this page stays focused on status changes, follow-up timing, and revision-cycle expectations.

Source basis
Wiley: The peer review process
authorservices.wiley.com
Used to verify the standard steps from submission to editorial decision in an official publisher workflow guide.
Wiley: Peer review
authorservices.wiley.com
Used to verify common outcomes such as revision, rejection, and what authors should expect during review.
ICMJE Recommendations
icmje.org
Used to reinforce the broader journal-submission and revision norms behind timeline and follow-up advice.
Reviewer response letter guide
acaids.com
Used to supplement point-by-point response and revision communication scenarios.
Cover Letter template
acaids.com
Used to supplement editor-communication scenarios before and after submission.
Topic graph

Related workflows and reference pages

Generate defense slidesPrepare defense Q&ARead the defense preparation guideRead the SCI polishing guidePrepare reviewer responsesUse the cover letter template

What this page helps you do first

  • Average review periods by SCI journal discipline and tier
  • Meanings of each manuscript status change
  • When and how to professionally follow up with editors

Standard journal peer review workflow and timeline

From submission to publication: submission (1-3 days) → editor initial review (1-4 weeks) → peer review (2-6 months) → decision → revision (1-3 months) → re-review (1-3 months) → acceptance (1-2 months) → proofreading (2-4 weeks) → online publication.

Review periods by journal type

  • [Q1 Top journals (IF>10)] Average 3-6 months review
  • [Q1 journals (IF 5-10)] Average 2-4 months review
  • [Q2 journals (IF 3-5)] Average 1-3 months review
  • [Q3 journals (IF 1-3)] Average 1-2 months review
  • [Query tools] Elsevier Journal Finder, Springer Journal Suggester, Wiley Journal Finder

Common status meanings and normal duration

  • [Submitted to Journal] 1-3 days to next status
  • [With Editor] Usually 1-2 weeks to assign reviewers
  • [Under Review] Longest phase: typically 2-6 months
  • [Required Reviews Completed] Usually 1-2 weeks to editor decision
  • [Major/Minor Revision] Good sign — typically 1-3 months to respond

When and how to follow up professionally

  • [When to follow up] Usually after exceeding average review period by 1+ month
  • [Email template] Dear [Editor Name], I am writing to inquire about the status of my manuscript (ID: [ID], Title: [Title]) submitted to [Journal] on [Date]. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, [Author]

Frequently asked questions

Has my paper been rejected if Under Review exceeds 6 months?
No. Under Review only means the paper is still being evaluated. Review duration varies based on journal tier, reviewer availability, and number of review rounds.
What are the odds of rejection after Major Revision?
Typically 20-30%. Major Revision means reviewers see value but need significant changes. Thorough responses and revisions greatly improve acceptance odds.
Reviewer response letter guideSCI/EI paper writing guide